seokopat

service · software

> seokopat.build("module")

Software Development

We start where off the shelf software stops. Panels, integrations, automation: whatever slows the business down gets handed to software.

In most companies a critical process lives inside one person's spreadsheet. When they take a week off the work stops, when a formula breaks nobody notices, and as channels multiply the manual transfers start producing errors. That is exactly where software belongs.

We build our own SaaS products: Muhasefy, Stokmatic, Compresify, Tagdio, Securify. So the code we write for a client follows the same discipline as the code we write for ourselves. Tests, logs, release rhythm, documentation; none of it is an extra line item here.

We do not disappear after delivery, but we do not lock you in either. The code lives in your repo, architectural decisions are written down, and handover documentation is part of the job. If another team takes over tomorrow, they should be able to.

01

Four pillars of the work

Thinking like a product team

We take problems, not orders. Before drawing a screen we draw the process: who decides what, and when. A badly framed screen goes unused no matter how well it is written.

Integration discipline

Writing the API call is the easy part. The real work is handling failure: retries, queues, duplicate protection, reconciliation reports.

Robustness and visibility

Logging, error tracking and core tests are set up from the start. When something breaks we do not guess where, we look.

Release rhythm

Instead of a large package unveiled six months later, we ship genuinely usable pieces every couple of weeks. Anything going the wrong way shows up early.

02

What we see most often

The process depends on a spreadsheet

Pricing, stock or order tracking runs in one file. It slows down as it grows, nobody notices when a formula breaks, and only one person really understands it.

The integration was written once

It worked the day it was connected and was then forgotten. When the other side returns an error there is no retry, nothing is logged, and the order quietly disappears.

There is a panel and nobody uses it

The screen was shaped by the database, not the process. Users cannot reach in five clicks what they need every day, so everyone goes back to spreadsheets.

The developer left and nobody can touch it

No documentation, environment variables on somebody's laptop, deployments done by hand. Even a small change becomes a risk.

Everything is wanted at once

Scope keeps growing and nothing finishes. Without written priorities a project does not end, it just gets tired.

03

Scope

No project needs all of this. After discovery we agree on what gets built and, just as importantly, what does not.

Web applications

  • Admin panels, dashboards and internal tools
  • Multi user roles and permissions
  • Reporting screens with Excel and PDF output
  • Customer portals and quote flows
  • Multilingual interfaces

Integration and automation

  • Marketplace connections: Trendyol, Hepsiburada, Amazon
  • Shipping, payment and e-invoice integrations
  • Data exchange with ERP and accounting systems
  • Webhooks, queues and scheduled jobs
  • Reconciliation and error reports

Infrastructure

  • Deployment pipeline and staging environment
  • Backups and rollback plans
  • Logging, error tracking and basic monitoring
  • Performance and database tuning

Maintenance and handover

  • Code handover, repo and access transferred to you
  • Architecture and setup documentation
  • Team training and a walkthrough
  • Monthly maintenance and development support
04

How we work

  1. 01

    Discovery

    We listen to the process end to end and review the current systems and data. The resulting map shows which step software should take over.

  2. 02

    Scope and architecture

    What gets built and what does not are both written down. Technology choices are decided here, with the reasoning attached.

  3. 03

    First working version

    We ship the narrowest genuinely usable piece. Once the team starts using it the rest of the scope usually changes, which is a good thing.

  4. 04

    Release rhythm

    We ship on a regular cadence. Every release is checked on staging first and going live is planned, never improvised.

  5. 05

    Handover

    Code, documentation and access move to you. Whether or not we keep maintaining it, the system stays in your hands.

05

Who this is for

Good fit

  • Companies with settled processes that off the shelf tools no longer cover
  • Multichannel brands struggling with integrations
  • Operations where manual work and error rates grow together
  • Projects where existing software needs to be taken over

Not a good fit

  • Early ideas where the requirements are not decided yet
  • Requests for unlimited scope at a fixed price
  • Work with no clear owner; if direction changes every meeting, nothing ships
  • Requests for a pixel by pixel clone of an existing product
06

What we watch

Software is not measured in lines of code. These get chosen per project and agreed up front.

Manual handling time and number of touched stepsIntegration error rate and retry outcomesResponse time of critical operationsProduction errors and time to resolutionUptime and planned downtimeAge of the open work list

The same team as our own products

The people who built Muhasefy, Stokmatic, Compresify, Tagdio and Securify are the same people here. That lets us see scaling problems early, and lets us say honestly whether a need should be built from scratch or covered by an existing product.

07

How the engagement works

Scope and duration

For well defined projects we can quote a fixed price. Where uncertainty is high we price a short discovery phase separately; a fixed price on a vague scope misleads both sides.

Team and communication

You talk directly to the people writing the code. We demo regularly, and the repo and task list are open to you; progress is visible in the code, not in a deck.

Code and ownership

The repo is yours. Environment variables, documentation and access are part of the handover package. If you continue with another team tomorrow, nothing is missing.

08

Frequently asked

Which technologies do you use?

Our default is Next.js, TypeScript and Postgres, the same stack as our own products. Even so, the choice is made per project and the reasoning is written down. If your team will maintain it, the stack they already know is often the right one.

Do we keep the code?

Yes. The repo is opened under your account or transferred to you. We do not build models that hold source code hostage.

Will you quote a fixed price?

When the scope is clear, yes. When it is not, we suggest a short discovery phase priced separately. A fixed price on an unclear scope ends up hurting one side or the other.

Can you take over our existing software?

We do. We read the code first and produce a short audit: what can be carried forward, what needs rewriting and what that costs, stated plainly.

How does maintenance work?

A monthly maintenance and development package can be set up. Critical bugs come first, feature requests get queued. If you prefer, we can cover critical issues only.

How long does it take?

A first usable version usually ships in four to eight weeks. The number of integrations, the quality of the other parties' APIs and your own decision speed are the three factors that move that timeline.

Describe the process, we will handle the software

Tell us what slows you down the most right now. In the first conversation we will work out whether it is solved by software, by a process change, or by a product that already exists.

Related services